Title: Logistics in the Falklands War: A
Case Study in Expeditionary Warfare
Author: Kenneth L Privratsky
ISBN: 978-1-47382-312-9
Publisher: Pen and Sword Books
Year: 2016
Hardcover
Pages: 271
Photos/Maps: 54/6
The Falkland’s War was a conflict that
no-one anticipated or effectively planned for. A conventional war fought
between two individual nations, one NATO the other South American, had simply
not been in the paradigm of western planners for literally decades as focus had
remained exclusively on the NATO-Warsaw Pact standoff. That the British
prevailed was as much a testament to professionalism and their ability to
improvise as it was to a heavy dose of luck. Logistics was the key to success
in this conflict; the author, drawing upon interviews and primary source
material, paints a vivid picture of the challenges facing the support elements
of this force. The lessons that he gleans from his research are many and I have
identified some of the more significant ones below, covering a broad spectrum
of support doctrine.
Effective control of logistics relies
heavily upon a clear delineation of command and responsibility. Give the
distances involved and the resultant paucity of resources, it was strange that
the overall commander of the British Task Force (Commander South Atlantic Task
Force) Admiral Fieldhouse, did not sail with the fleet. This left task force
logisticians trying to support four sub-group commanders (Rear Admiral Woodward
– Commander Carrier Battle Group, Brig Thompson – Commander Landing Force,
Commodore Clapp – Commander Amphibious Task Force and Captain Young – Commander
Op Paraquet) who each had equal standing under Fieldhouse. Poor strategic and
operational communication ability meant that inevitably conflicts arose
relating to priority of support.
Additional challenges identified by the
author included the breakdown of logistics discipline during the deployment
phase to Ascension Island. Unfortunately, this is not an unusual case and has
been repeated many times since the Falklands War. Clear marking, tracking
information and prioritization is critical if items are not to be mishandled or
misplaced. As soon as tracking control is lost over items, especially during a
period of intense throughput, it is like randomly placing a book on a library
shelf, the item will be most likely lost for the duration of the operation. The
same holds true for inaccurate prioritization. Items are handled and given
space on aircraft etc based upon their identified priority. Unfortunately, the
old adage holds true: if everything is identified as priority, then nothing is
priority. The need to maintain logistics discipline, regardless of the pressure
to get things out of the door, is absolutely critical to the effective support
of an operation.
Another area that the author discusses
in detail is the atrophying of skill sets such as amphibious assaults into
austere environments fully supported by logistics. Cost cutting and a paradigm
of first world support available through NATO nations sapped the British of
experience and knowledge. This reluctance to expend defence dollars on
realistic training was not limited to the UK but their experience serves as a
warning to other nations that it is “too late to buy insurance once the house
is on fire”. Many Western members of the NATO alliance find themselves severely
limited in their ability to undertake operations of any significant magnitude
unilaterally due to a degradation or atrophying of skills and resources due to
a reliance upon others to make up any shortfalls.
British victory in the Falkland’s war
was not a foregone conclusion. One of the points that the author makes is that,
while the British did lose a significant number of assets during the war,
predominantly they were picket ships or combat vessels as opposed to support
ships. Argentine orders to their pilots were to target the logistics elements
of the fleet thereby crippling the British before they could get a foothold on
the ground. The pilots, generally, went after the fighting elements and either
consciously or otherwise, disregarded their orders. That they did was
exceptionally fortunate for the British.