Author: Col T.N. Dupuy
ISBN: 0-13-351114-6
Publisher: Prentice Hall
Year: 1977
Hardcover
Pages: 363
Maps: 19
Photos: 74
Students of modern
military history will agree that one of the most influential elements of the
modern command system in most if not all countries has been the legacy of the
German General Staff System, developed under the auspices of The Reformers (Scharnhorst,
Gneisenau, Clausewitz, Grolman and Boyen) following the collapse of the
Prussian military at the Battles of Jena and Auerstadt in 1807. Dupuy’s work
traces the development, institutionalization and influence of this system on
the German military and, by extension, State up to the end of 1945.
This is a brilliant analysis of the staff system.
Revolutionary in scope and visionary in implementation; it served to transform
the Prussian and German States from a third rate power to the standard by which
other militaries were measured. While the narrative is clear and logical, there
are three elements which stand out as being key to the success and ultimate
failure of the German military.
The first two and the foundation of the system (and that
which gave it such resiliency and capacity) was the Founders success at
“Institutionalizing Military Excellence”. This entailed ensuring the
development and maintenance of a military as free as possible from the
‘vagaries of change’ resultant from human fallibility. In effect ensuring
military excellence regardless of the influence of changing leadership. Dupuy
provides an insightful and concise discourse on how the Germans developed a
process of ensuring an Army of consistent and reliable ‘Organizational Genius’
while concurrently providing the structure within which leaders of ‘Operational
Genius’ were developed. Additionally, the military leadership was to remain
aloof and disconnected to the political machinations of the State.
The third aspect that they endeavoured to implement, but
were ultimately unsuccessful, was ensuring that the military and its leadership
were seen and understood to be tools of and accountable to the people of
Prussia and ultimately, Germany. Where this failed was in the relationship
between the Kaiser and the Reichstag (or Parliament). The Kaiser insisted upon
an Army that was loyal to and controlled by Him. Thus it was that the
leadership and the Army swore fealty to the Kaiser and not to Germany (as
represented by the people).
The book goes a long way towards providing an explanation as
to why the German Army remained an effective, focussed fighting force right up
until the last days of the Second World War. It also, by extension, explains
why the military did not intervene with the rise of Hitler and also swore an
oath to him. Dupuy’s analysis shows the strength of the system that the Germans
had created and how it translated into such an effective military force.
Additionally, the dangers of providing such an effective tool to an individual
as opposed to an accountable entity is also made abundantly clear.
No comments:
Post a Comment