Title: Blood
in the Forest: The End of the Second World War in the Courland Pocket
Author:
Vincent Hunt
ISBN:
978-1-91151-206-6
Publisher:
Helion Publishing
Year:
2017
Hardcover
Pages: 268
Photos/Maps:
38/6
While
the world’s attention was focussed upon the dramatic race between the US and
British forces in the West and the Soviet forces in the East racing towards
Berlin, a cataclysmic struggle was unfolding on a small (relatively) expanse of
land jutting out into the Baltic Sea from Latvia: the Courland Pocket. Germany
had to hold onto the ports and facilities in this region to continue to give it
an area within which to develop and build its new u-boat fleet (free from the
strategic bombers of the West) and to deny the Soviets unfettered access to the
Baltic Sea. The Soviets, for their part, viewed this region as not only part of
their empire occupied by the Germans but as a breakaway region (Latvia) that
needed to be reconquered and occupied.
Over a
half-million soldiers were involved in the fighting on both sides.
Interestingly, the Germans were able to maintain their logistical support lines
due to the port facilities at Liepaja and Ventspils. As a result, and also due
to the constricted lines of approach open to the Soviets, the Germans and their
Allies were able to hold off the Soviets despite six distinct Army level
battles between October, 1944 and May, 1945. Over that period the Germans were
pushed back but retained over two-thirds of the territory originally held at
the commencement of the fighting.
Unique
to this campaign was the distribution of Latvian nationals fighting for both
protagonists (Soviet and German). The reasons for doing so were varied and in
many cases did not involve a choice; nevertheless, families were often divided
and members found themselves fighting each other on opposite sides. Adding
additional complexity to the region was the asymmetric fighting going on behind
both the German and Soviet lines involving a myriad of groups oftentimes
fighting each other as well as the ‘occupiers’.
The
author has adopted a distinctive approach to his writing that initially is
somewhat distracting until the reader adapts to it. As opposed to drafting an
exclusively historical narrative to describe the events of the period, he has
interwoven a discussion of his modern day travels throughout the region, his
meetings with survivors and a rendition of the period events of the battles. He
also discusses issues not directly related to the base line narrative such as
the experiences of Vaira Vike-Freiberga the former President of Latvia who was
a young girl during the period of the war. While these stories perhaps add
overall context to the environment, they do not add to the discussion of the specifics
of the Courland struggle.
What
the author has presented well is the complexity of the societal aspects of the
fighting. There was no question in anyone’s minds that the Germans were not
going to prevail. Given that, the Latvians were looking to promises made by the
Allied governments that they would be granted independence once Germany had
surrendered; they therefore wished to facilitate this by preventing a
reoccupation by the Soviets by assisting the Germans in resistance. They were
therefore caught on the horns of a dilemma as they desperately tried to find a
way out of the vice of the German and Soviet Armies. Hunt does a commendable
job explaining and analyzing the motivations and hopes of the different
protagonists. As he notes however, he was not able to get a perspective from
the Russian side as no veterans from the conflict could be found.
No comments:
Post a Comment