Sunday, 14 February 2016
The Indian Army and the End of the Raj - Daniel Marston
This review has been submitted to War History Online Magazine.
Author: Daniel Marston
Publisher: Cambridge UP
Intratheatre civil conflict, with its roots in religion, tribalism or ethnic differences, represents some of the most brutal and savage of conflicts. When initiated by political forces seeking advantage over adversaries it quickly transcends control or reason and reveals the most base of human behaviours. The period covered by Marston in his analysis of the Indian Army (IA), 1945-1947, represents a perfect storm of challenge when internal and external pressures exerted upon the Indian Army were such that it should have collapsed; that it didn't is testament to the esprit-des-corps and leadership of the force. Marston's book looks at the pressures exerted upon the IA and how it was able to continue to effectively carry out its duties despite the challenges that it faced.
Commencing with a look at the operations of the IA during the Second World War, the effects of the dramatic expansion from a few hundred thousand to over 2.5 million soldiers by war's end, the struggles with the defeats in Burma, the enhanced professionalism of the IA in the latter years of the War, the effect of the Indian National Army and the role that the Muslim Brotherhood and National Congress had on the morale and effectiveness of the IA, Marston paints a picture of an army professionalized and tempered in the crucible of conflict. He also presents a comprehensive picture of the domestic environment within the Raj's India as internal communal pressures intensified.
1946 witnessed the beginnings of the period of the trials for the IA as storm clouds gathered over the subcontinent and the Government of the Raj struggled with a British foreign policy that appeared to be at odds with itself (use of the IA for re-imposition of Colonial rule on behalf of European allies while concurrently initiating and accelerating the process of withdrawal from India). Additionally, the IA was subject to domestic pressure as it rapidly demobilized to a peacetime strength of approximately 450,000, undertook rapid Indianization as British Officers retired or were demobilized, maintained its role as the "Sword of the Raj" the impartial maintainer of domestic harmony in the face of a rapidly deteriorating internal security situation and dealt with an unclear future for its members as Britain and the Indian domestic leadership struggled to find a way ahead.
Marston's analysis continued into 1947 as a timeline for partition and the establishment of two distinct countries was announced. The IA was further stressed by ongoing political machinations by the rival parties, ongoing Indianization far faster than the British commanders in the Raj's army recommended, the enhanced capability of the insurgents through the involvement of demobilized Indian soldiers in communal violence, the effective collapse of the police and the Civil Service and the announcement of a three month time frame for dividing the army into two distinct entities. Yet, despite all of this, it continued to effectively undertake its tasks assigned by the Raj with a minimum of internal dissent. Marston's approach of drawing upon multiple primary and secondary sources paints a very comprehensive and balanced picture for the reader that further reinforces the stunning accomplishments of the IA given its environment.
A key strength of this work is the authors in depth analysis of why the IA was able to maintain cohesion when faced with literally years of combat and a domestic situation that easily would have broken most militaries. He focuses his assessment primarily on the following areas:
1. The proactive and structured Indianization of the IA during the period leading up to and during the Second World War by the British leadership. This was critical as it provided the Indian leadership of the Army with both the depth and cross section of commanders needed to not only effectively command but also to overcome racial and religious divide. The British and Indians promoted on merit and proven competence and maintained mixed units that had hundreds of years of history. Thus individuals came to see themselves as The Guides or a Rajputana Rifle as opposed to Sikh, Muslim or Hindu.
2. The effect of the war and shared experiences in developing a deep sense of esprit-des-corps, confidence and trust in leadership that transcended communal differences.
3. A conscious effort by the British to keep the IA free from political influence and outside of the decision making infighting that plagued the civilian leadership landscape. It was continuously reinforced that the IA was above politics and that it served the government in power. The ability of the IA to maintain its discipline and professionalism reinforced a sense of not only pride but disdain for the civilians who were undertaking civil disobedience. This was further enhanced as they watched the police and civil service collapse. The IA came to view itself as a bulwark against absolute anarchy and a complete breakdown of civil society (this especially when they witnessed the degree of violence and brutality around them).
4. A decision by the British to further expand the traditional recruiting grounds of the IA in order to ensure a more balanced force that better reflected the cross section of race and class from across India. Thus did the IA promote better understanding and appreciation of India's 'cultures'.