This review has been submitted to War History Online Magazine.
Author:
Daniel Marston
ISBN:
978-0-521-89975-8
Publisher:
Cambridge UP
Year:
2014
Hardcover
Pages:
386
Photographs/maps:
12/5
Intratheatre
civil conflict, with its roots in religion, tribalism or ethnic differences,
represents some of the most brutal and savage of conflicts. When initiated by
political forces seeking advantage over adversaries it quickly transcends
control or reason and reveals the most base of human behaviours. The period
covered by Marston in his analysis of the Indian Army (IA), 1945-1947, represents a
perfect storm of challenge when internal and external pressures exerted upon
the Indian Army were such that it should have collapsed; that it didn't is testament
to the esprit-des-corps and leadership of the force. Marston's book looks at
the pressures exerted upon the IA and how it was able to continue to
effectively carry out its duties despite the challenges that it faced.
Commencing
with a look at the operations of the IA during the Second World War, the
effects of the dramatic expansion from a few hundred thousand to over 2.5
million soldiers by war's end, the struggles with the defeats in Burma, the
enhanced professionalism of the IA in the latter years of the War, the effect
of the Indian National Army and the role
that the Muslim Brotherhood and National Congress had on the morale and
effectiveness of the IA, Marston paints a picture of an army
professionalized and tempered in the crucible of conflict. He also presents a
comprehensive picture of the domestic environment within the Raj's India as
internal communal pressures intensified.
1946
witnessed the beginnings of the period of the trials for the IA as storm
clouds gathered over the subcontinent and the Government of the Raj struggled
with a British foreign policy that appeared
to be at odds with itself (use of the IA for re-imposition of
Colonial rule on behalf of European allies while concurrently initiating and
accelerating the process of withdrawal from India). Additionally, the IA was subject to domestic
pressure as it rapidly demobilized to a peacetime strength of approximately 450,000,
undertook rapid Indianization as British Officers retired or were demobilized, maintained its role as the "Sword of the Raj" the
impartial maintainer of domestic harmony in the face of a rapidly deteriorating
internal security situation and dealt with an unclear future for its members as
Britain and the Indian domestic leadership struggled to find a way ahead.
Marston's
analysis continued into 1947 as a timeline for partition and the establishment of
two distinct countries was announced. The IA was further stressed by ongoing
political machinations by the rival parties, ongoing Indianization far faster
than the British commanders in the Raj's army recommended, the enhanced capability
of the insurgents through the involvement of demobilized Indian soldiers in
communal violence, the effective collapse of the police and the Civil Service and
the announcement of a three month time frame for dividing the army into two
distinct entities. Yet, despite all of this, it continued to effectively
undertake its tasks assigned by the Raj with a minimum of internal dissent.
Marston's approach of drawing upon multiple primary and secondary sources paints a very comprehensive
and balanced picture for the reader that further reinforces the stunning
accomplishments of the IA given its environment.
A key
strength of this work is the authors in depth analysis of why the IA was able
to maintain cohesion when faced with literally years of combat and a domestic
situation that easily would have broken most militaries. He focuses his
assessment primarily on the following areas:
1. The
proactive and structured Indianization of the IA during the period leading up
to and during the Second World War by the British leadership. This was critical
as it provided the Indian leadership of the Army with both the depth and cross
section of commanders needed to not only effectively command but also to
overcome racial and religious divide. The British and Indians promoted on merit
and proven competence and maintained mixed units that had hundreds of years of
history. Thus individuals came to see themselves as The Guides or a Rajputana
Rifle as opposed to Sikh, Muslim or Hindu.
2. The
effect of the war and shared experiences in developing a deep sense of
esprit-des-corps, confidence and trust in leadership that transcended communal
differences.
3. A
conscious effort by the British to keep the IA free from political influence
and outside of the decision making infighting that plagued the civilian
leadership landscape. It was continuously reinforced that the IA was above
politics and that it served the government in power. The ability of the IA to
maintain its discipline and professionalism reinforced a sense of not only
pride but disdain for the civilians who were undertaking civil disobedience.
This was further enhanced as they watched the police and civil service
collapse. The IA came to view itself as a bulwark against absolute anarchy
and a complete breakdown of civil society (this especially when they witnessed the degree of violence and brutality around them).
4. A
decision by the British to further expand the traditional recruiting grounds of
the IA in order to ensure a more balanced force that better reflected the
cross section of race and class from across India. Thus did the IA promote
better understanding and appreciation of India's 'cultures'.
No comments:
Post a Comment