Author: Dr Boris Sokolov
ISBN: 978-1-909982-10-9
Publisher: Helion Publishing
Year: 2015
Hardcover
Pages: 493
Photographs/Maps: 23/11
History is replete with biographies of US, Canadian,
British and German Commanders from the Second World War; however, there is a
marked lack of in-depth commander studies from the Russian perspective that
have not been skewed through the Soviet lens. Marshall Rokossovsky is a case in
point. One of the finest Commanders of the Second World War, a Pole who
considered himself to be Russian but was never truly trusted or accepted by
either, a Bolshevik, victim of Stalin’s purges and a cavalryman who began his military
career in 1916, Rokossovsky life and career represented a microcosm of the
potential, good and bad of the Soviet Union. A humble yet driven commander he
lacked a formal higher education but was an avid student of the martial arts.
He was deeply involved throughout the Barbarossa Campaign commencing as a Corps
Commander in June, 1941, ending as a Front Commander in 1945 and ended his
career as the Chief Inspector of the Soviet Army and Deputy Minister of
Defense.
Sokolov is very upfront that he holds Rokossovsky in the
highest regard as both an Officer and a man. Alone amongst the Marshall’s he
did not resort to threats or intimidation nor did he directly order the
execution of any subordinates. He was a driven Commander who held the lives of
his soldiers in the highest regard. Nevertheless, the author is balanced in his
appraisal of the Marshall and does not hesitate to highlight areas of weakness
as well as strength. His assessment of Rokossovsky as a strategist and maneuver
warfare specialist clearly identifies that, while competent, he was not a
master of his craft; rather his strength lay in his leadership and motivation
of his soldiers and officers, the drawing upon their skill sets and his
willingness to accept risk and make decisions.
There was not a great deal of source material available
for this book left by Rokossovsky, therefore, Sokolov drew upon primary sources
in the Russian archives, recollections of former subordinates and colleagues as
well as family members and histories. The material reflects the challenges of
separating the chaff and wheat in terms of the written recollections of the
Soviet era. Typical of this period was a tendency of commanders to modify their
reports to place them in a better light. Sokolov has done an excellent job at
identifying instances of this and using alternate sources to draw attention to
these inconsistencies. He has provided insight into his subject’s strengths and
weaknesses through an in depth analysis of the challenges that Rokossovsky
faced during his career. Consistent throughout were four themes: his love of
family, his struggle with Polish/Russian identity, his loyalty and
responsibility to the soldiers under his command and his avoidance of any
criticism of Stalin despite his horrible experiences at Stalin’s direction.
I like that you wrote about his writing style.
ReplyDelete