Title: Predator: The Secret Origins of the Drone Revolution
Author: Richard Whittle
ISBN: 978-0-8050-9964-5
Publisher: Henry Holt and Company
Year: 2014
Hardcover
Pages: 353
Photos: 26
Predator missions and strike footage is today
considered to be rather mundane in the world of news media; real time video of
‘bad guys’ being struck by hellfire missiles or smart bombs is no longer the
stuff of science fiction. However, it was not that long ago that this level of
technological sophistication left its viewers incredulous. Whittle’s book
traces the history not only of the development of the UAV (unmanned aerial
vehicle), its transition from a purely reconnaissance to a weapons platform and
ultimately its adoption and employment
in operations throughout the world. He also discusses the challenges related to
UAV operations, especially with the addition of weapons to its arsenal and
specifically command and control and legal hurdles that had to be dealt with.
Whittle’s premise, that the UAV was a
revolutionary surveillance and weapons platform that changed the very nature of
warfare, is justified by the end of the book but is also tempered by the degree
of difficulty that the UAV program faced by conventional thinking and
bureaucratic inertia. Like many breakthrough technologies, it was envisioned
and developed by civilian companies who found it very difficult to convince the
government and military of its relevance on the modern battlefield.
The book highlights a number of
interesting consequences of the UAV program and the advent of new technology
onto the battlefield:
a. The marked increase in the challenges of micro-management as senior
officers used the ‘real time’ technology to provide oversight, advice and
assistance well below their traditional span of control;
b. The challenges of bureaucracy as an impediment to change and,
concurrently, what can be accomplished in incredibly short periods given the
right motivation and backing (referring here to the success of the Big Safari
organization in implementing technological advances in the UAV and
communications systems);
c. The challenge of command and control when multiple agencies operate
within the same (developmental or operational) battle space. In the case of the
Predator, various agencies such as the USAF, CIA US Army and Navy all had
proverbial fingers in the pie thereby frustrating clear lines of authority;
d. The time delay relating to authority for launch when it is
centralized at the most senior levels; and
e. The legal confusion related to what kind of weapon was represented
by the Predator UAV. For example, could it be controlled and launched on third
party soil, did it violate international treaties and did it represent a
violation of Federal law with regard to CIA oversight?
No comments:
Post a Comment